United States: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Surviving "Entire Fairness" Review Is Not Conclusive Of A Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Where Directors Acted Inequitably - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq

12 Jul 2021 0 shares 1 views

United States: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Surviving "Entire Fairness" Review Is Not Conclusive Of A Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Where Directors Acted Inequitably - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq

Published 12 Jul 2021

In Coster v. UIP Companies, Inc., No. 49-2020, 2021 WL 2644094 (Del. June 28, 2021), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Court of Chancery ruling, No. 2018-0440-KSJM, 2020 WL 429906...

Full Article

United States: California Supreme Court Announces New Standard That Meal And Rest Period Premiums Must Be Paid At Same "Regular Rate Of Pay" Used To Calculate Overtime Payments - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq 26 Jul 2021

On July 15, 2021, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC which was long-awaited but..

United States: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Surviving "Entire Fairness" Review Is Not Conclusive Of A Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Where Directors Acted Inequitably - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

United States: Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Surviving "Entire Fairness" Review Is Not Conclusive Of A Breach Of Fiduciary Duty Claim Where Directors Acted Inequitably - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

You might like

Related news coverage

United States: California Supreme Court Announces New Standard That Meal And Rest Period Premiums Must Be Paid At Same "Regular Rate Of Pay" Used To Calculate Overtime Payments - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Advertisement