United States: To Litigate Or Arbitrate? Analyzing The Pros And Cons Of Arbitration Agreements With Class Action Waivers In The Employment Context - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq

03 Mar 2023 0 shares 1 views

United States: To Litigate Or Arbitrate? Analyzing The Pros And Cons Of Arbitration Agreements With Class Action Waivers In The Employment Context - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq

Published 03 Mar 2023

New York Labor and Employment attorneys Christopher Collins and Lindsay Stone published an article in the New York Law Journal that tracks some of the more significant developments...

Full Article

Worldwide: Non-Compete And No-Poach Agreements: Towards Convergence Of The US And EU Approaches? - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Following up on an earlier blog post outlining the United States Federal Trade Commission's ("FTC") increased regulatory action..

Mondaq 29 Mar 2023

United States: Ninth Circuit Decision In Live Nation And Ticketmaster's Favor Highlights Subtleties Of Drafting Enforceable Arbitration Provisions - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

In Oberstein v. Live Nation Ent. Inc. No. 21-56200 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2023), the Ninth Circuit addressed the question of whether..

Mondaq 08 Mar 2023

United States: To Litigate Or Arbitrate? Analyzing The Pros And Cons Of Arbitration Agreements With Class Action Waivers In The Employment Context - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

United States: To Litigate Or Arbitrate? Analyzing The Pros And Cons Of Arbitration Agreements With Class Action Waivers In The Employment Context - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

You might like

Related news coverage

Worldwide: Non-Compete And No-Poach Agreements: Towards Convergence Of The US And EU Approaches? - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

United States: Ninth Circuit Decision In Live Nation And Ticketmaster's Favor Highlights Subtleties Of Drafting Enforceable Arbitration Provisions - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Advertisement