United States: District Court Gatekeeping Responsibility For Expert Witness Testimony To Increase Under Proposed Changes To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702 - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Mondaq

03 May 2023 0 shares 1 views

United States: District Court Gatekeeping Responsibility For Expert Witness Testimony To Increase Under Proposed Changes To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702 - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Mondaq

Published 03 May 2023

Sister blog Global Investigations and Compliance Review posted a very read-worthy recent blog authored by our colleagues Marisa Darden, Ayako Russell and Jay Thomas. Addressing proposed...

Full Article

United States: Federal Circuit Holds That Software Plaintiff Bears Evidentiary Burden Of Copyrightability Where Defendant's Evidence Shows Some Elements Not Copyrightable - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Mondaq 29 May 2023

In a case that could have some lasting impact, the Federal Circuit recently affirmed a 2020 ruling by Judge Rodney Gilstrap in the..

More coverage

United States: Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Holds Invasion Of Privacy And Wiretapping Claims Against E-Commerce Company Not Subject To Binding Arbitration - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Mondaq 10 May 2023

A putative federal class action brought on behalf of delivery drivers asserting invasion of privacy and wiretapping claims against..

United States: District Court Gatekeeping Responsibility For Expert Witness Testimony To Increase Under Proposed Changes To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702 - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

United States: District Court Gatekeeping Responsibility For Expert Witness Testimony To Increase Under Proposed Changes To Federal Rule Of Evidence 702 - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

You might like

Related news coverage

United States: Federal Circuit Holds That Software Plaintiff Bears Evidentiary Burden Of Copyrightability Where Defendant's Evidence Shows Some Elements Not Copyrightable - Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Advertisement

More coverage

United States: Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Holds Invasion Of Privacy And Wiretapping Claims Against E-Commerce Company Not Subject To Binding Arbitration - Squire Patton Boggs LLP