data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea256/ea256a9735eb01d527936baa9c9c6b7c38d0ced3" alt="India: A Party's Insistence On Complying With Pre-Arbitral Steps Would Be Meaningless If It Fails To Respond To The Counter-Party's Notice Invoking Arbitration: Delhi High Court - Trinity Chambers"
India: A Party's Insistence On Complying With Pre-Arbitral Steps Would Be Meaningless If It Fails To Respond To The Counter-Party's Notice Invoking Arbitration: Delhi High Court - Trinity Chambers
In a recent decision in Akhil Gupta v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. , the Delhi High Court, while deciding upon a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act")...
Full Article