United States: "Comparison Prior Art" Must Be Tied To The Same Article Of Manufacture As That Claimed - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq

03 May 2024 0 shares 1 views

United States: "Comparison Prior Art" Must Be Tied To The Same Article Of Manufacture As That Claimed - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Mondaq

Published 03 May 2024

Columbia asserted U.S. Design Patent No. D657,093, which claims "[t]he ornamental design of a heat reflective material" featuring contrasting wavy lines...

Full Article

United States: Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB's Ruling Of Swearing Behind A Prior Art Reference - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

In Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Teleflex Innovations S.A.R.L., the case addresses whether the final written..

Mondaq 07 May 2024

United States: "Comparison Prior Art" Must Be Tied To The Same Article Of Manufacture As That Claimed - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

United States: "Comparison Prior Art" Must Be Tied To The Same Article Of Manufacture As That Claimed - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

You might like

Related news coverage

United States: Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB's Ruling Of Swearing Behind A Prior Art Reference - Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Advertisement