Some people claim that evolution has defeated the argument for God’s existence from the design found in life, but has it?
Evolution is the idea that all of life can be traced back to a common ancestor and that natural selection of random mutations can explain all the diversity in life.
We know that natural selection is simply a scientific fact, but how powerful is it?
Can natural selection produce new types of organisms?
One scientist, Michael Behe, has argued that natural selection is not powerful enough to produce new species.
Based on the evidence from studying fruit flies, malaria interacting with sickle-cell anemia, and HIV, Behe says that there seems to be a limit to what the evolutionary process can produce that falls short of new species.
If this is true, then it indicates that evolution, on a large scale, is false.
If evolution is false, then certainly it can’t prove that there is no God.
However, even if evolution is true, it still doesn’t prove that there is no God.
It might weaken the design-of-life argument somewhat, but evolution still can’t explain the origin of life in the first place.
Plus, there are many other good arguments for God’s existence that aren’t related to evolution at all.
The existence of God and evolution are not mutually exclusive beliefs.
