United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

Mondaq

25 Apr 2024 0 shares 1 views

United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

Mondaq

Published 25 Apr 2024

On April 17, 2023, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 22-193, holding that transferees alleging discrimination under Title VII ...

Full Article

United States: U.S. Supreme Court Ruling May Expand Employers' Exposure To Title VII Lawsuits Over Job Transfers - Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Mondaq 26 Apr 2024

Recent years have seen multiple court rulings addressing whether certain allegedly discriminatory and retaliatory actions by..

United States: Supreme Court Clarifies When Job Transfers Can Serve As A Basis For Title VII Claims - Foley Hoag LLP
Mondaq 26 Apr 2024
United States: Harm Need Not Be Significant In Title VII Suits Over Job Transfers: Supreme Court - Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mondaq 26 Apr 2024
United States: U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Title VII Requires Employees Establish Only "Some Harm" As A Result Of Transfer, Rejecting Lower Court Ruling That Harm Must Be "Significant" To Constitute Discrimination - Ford & Harrison LLP
Mondaq 25 Apr 2024
United States: Supreme Court Rejects Heightened Harm Requirement In Title VII Discrimination Case - WilmerHale
Mondaq 24 Apr 2024

United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

United States: Muldrow Case Recalibrates Title VII "Significant Harm" Standard - Crowell & Moring LLP

You might like

Related news coverage

United States: U.S. Supreme Court Ruling May Expand Employers' Exposure To Title VII Lawsuits Over Job Transfers - Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Advertisement